[Wikileaks]Japan: AMBASSADOR ROOS’S MEETING WITH MINISTER MAEHARA

Viewing cable 09TOKYO2822, AMBASSADOR ROOS’S MEETING WITH MINISTER MAEHARA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags#cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TOKYO2822.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09TOKYO2822 2009-12-10 05:10 2011-05-04 00:00 SECRET Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO2025
OO RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHKO #2822/01 3440510
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 100510Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8117
INFO RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 2235
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 3325
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 8901
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA IMMEDIATE 7856
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA IMMEDIATE 0205
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE IMMEDIATE 1667
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO IMMEDIATE 8362
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI IMMEDIATE 7539
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/TREASURY DEPT WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USFJ  IMMEDIATE

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 TOKYO 002822

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/10/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV PINR JA
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR ROOS’S MEETING WITH MINISTER MAEHARA

TOKYO 00002822 001.2 OF 002

Classified By: Ambassador John V. Roos, Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

¶1. (S/NF) Summary: During a one-hour meeting, Minister
Maehara outlined the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ)
government’s plan to ultimately accept the existing Futenma
relocation plan, with or without the support of its coalition
partners. Maehara cautioned that his government must first
pass the 2010 budget, and that late April to early May was
when the DPJ could forge ahead with the Futenma plan even if
it meant breaking up their coalition with the Social
Democratic Party (SDP) and People’s New Party (PNP). Maehara
said that Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada will deliver this
message to the USG at an unspecified date. (Note: The
Ambassador promised Maehara we would keep close the following
information so please protect. End Note) End Summary.

¶2. (S/NF) Ambassador Roos met Minister of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism and State Minister for
Okinawa, Northern Territories, and Disaster Prevention Seiji
Maehara on December 9 at the Ambassador’s Residence. Maehara
told the Ambassador that five DPJ cabinet members (Prime
Minister Yukio Hatoyama, Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi
Hirano, Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada, Defense Minister
Toshimi Kitazawa, and Maehara) met on the evening of December
8 and agreed that they could not accept moving forward with
the Futenma Replacement Facility (FRF) because of opposition
from the DPJ’s coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party
(SDP). However, Maehara said, CCS Hirano was tasked with
working to get SDP and the DPJ’s other coalition partner, the
People’s New Party (PNP), on board with the following four
points of a “”plan of action”” regarding the FRF:

1: The GOJ would continue with the environmental impact
survey for the FRF plan at Henoko.

2: The DPJ government would earmark funds needed to fund
FRF in the upcoming budget based on the premise that
relocation to Henoko would happen (to be called “”yobi yosan,””
or “”reserve budget””).

3: The GOJ would explore “”alternative options”” to the
existing FRF plan that are acceptable to both the U.S. and
Okinawan people. The coalition partners would be involved in
this process. (Note: We have heard that the DPJ does not
expect USG involvement in this process of eliminating
alternatives. End Note)

4: If no alternative options are accepted, then SDP and
PNP would agree to accept the Henoko option. The two
coalition parties would have to agree to be responsible for
this coalition decision.

¶3. (S/NF) Maehara continued that even if the SDP and PNP do
not agree to this four-point plan now, once the DPJ coalition
government passes the 2010 budget and other budget-related
bills, it will be closer to the Upper House election and
because the DPJ values the U.S.-Japan alliance, it could then
drop the SDP and PNP from its coalition before the election.
People have been criticizing the two smaller parties, saying
they voted for the DPJ, not the SDP or PNP, Maehara pointed
out. Thus, it could be politically advantageous for the DPJ
to drop the two parties.

¶4. (S/NF) Under this scenario, if the U.S. does not agree to
any alternative to the existing FRF plan, the DPJ would be
prepared to go ahead with the current relocation plan and let
the coalition break up if necessary after Golden Week (April
29 to May 5 in 2010).

¶5. (S/NF) The Nago City election in Okinawa is likely to be
won by a candidate opposing the current relocation plan, but
it’s not the Nago mayor who would grant permission for the
landfill project, Maehara reminded the Ambassador. Instead,
it would be the Governor of Okinawa who would sign the
agreement.

TOKYO 00002822 002.2 OF 002

¶6. (S/NF) Ambassador Roos explained that the U.S. side had
its own problems with Congress as well as a problem with
Hatoyama telling POTUS to trust him but not following
through. Probed whether there was any way to get the deal
done this year, Maehara said he was 100% sure that the SDP
would not agree to go forward this year. Maehara also
acknowledged that the odds of finding a viable alternative to
the existing FRF plan were “”virtually zero”” but said his
government needed to go through the process despite further
damage it might do in Okinawa in getting Okinawans stirred up
even more.

¶7. (S/NF) Maehara said that there were only two countries who
enjoyed watching what was currently happening to the
U.S.-Japan alliance-China and the DPRK. He revealed that
while at APEC in Singapore recently, he heard from
journalists that many ASEAN leaders told POTUS they were
concerned about what was happening to the alliance.

¶8. (S/NF) Ultimately, Maehara concluded, PM Hatoyama is
absolutely committed to the alliance. People may think
Hatoyama may be setting the stage for a plan to have U.S.
troops stationed in Japan only in emergency situations, but
this is not the case at all, said Maehara. When asked how
and when this message (of the DPJ’s four-point plan on FRF)
will be officially delivered, Maehara said the current
intention is for the Foreign Minister to travel to Washington
DC to deliver the message. Exactly when it would happen was
unclear.

¶9. (SBU) Participants:

Ambassador Roos
Yumiko Miyazaki (interpreter)

Minister Maehara
Jun Nakahara (interpreter, Maehara’s secretary)

¶10. (U) Ambassador Roos has cleared this cable.
ROOS

広告
  1. まだコメントはありません。
  1. No trackbacks yet.

コメントを残す

以下に詳細を記入するか、アイコンをクリックしてログインしてください。

WordPress.com ロゴ

WordPress.com アカウントを使ってコメントしています。 ログアウト / 変更 )

Twitter 画像

Twitter アカウントを使ってコメントしています。 ログアウト / 変更 )

Facebook の写真

Facebook アカウントを使ってコメントしています。 ログアウト / 変更 )

Google+ フォト

Google+ アカウントを使ってコメントしています。 ログアウト / 変更 )

%s と連携中

%d人のブロガーが「いいね」をつけました。